| Microsoft: Silverlight content is searchable, too |
| Articles - Articles | |
| Friday, 04 July 2008 18:43 | |
|
When Adobe, Google and Yahoo announced earlier this week that content stored in its Flash file format would be more easily indexable by Google’s and Yahoo’s search engines, Microsoft was nowhere to be found. I seemed to recall that the Redmondians and their backers, when comparing Silverlight to Flash, had touted before that Silverlight content was easily discoverable by search engines (and not just Live Search’s). Was I dreaming? I asked Microsoft for verification and received the following statement from a company spokeswoman on July 2:
Another question for which I don’t (yet) have an answer: Can Live Search index Flash content today and how well? (Stay tuned. Let’s see what Microsoft has to say about that one.) Update: Ina Fried at News.com says Microsoft is not commenting on this question… at least for now. Any SEO experts or content developers/publishers done any comparative analysis on how Flash content and Silverlight content stack up on the findability front? Do you think the new agreements forged with Google and Yahoo (but not Microsoft for Live Search) are going to give Adobe a leg up over Microsoft on this front? If so, why? Meanwhile, on a related note, Microsoft has launched its Silverlight streaming ads pilot for which it began signing up testers earlier this spring. “This pilot program allows you to upload video content to Silverlight Streaming and play it back with contextual ads relevant to the playback experience, based on keywords you provide at video upload time, or configure later on in the video properties,” according to a July 2 posting on the Windows Live Dev blog. (Silverlight Streaming is Microsoft’s cloud storage service for Silverlight rich media content.) Source from zdnet.com |
|